Value Analysis Methodology

The following is an excerpt from our book, Pricing for Associations, available now on Amazon.

Value analysis is the compass that guides us towards crafting products and services that resonate deeply with our audience's needs and desires. It is not a solitary endeavor but a structured methodology that empowers us to gather feedback efficiently and comprehensively, offering valuable insights into our members, attendees, and sponsors. In this section, we'll explore the 'why' of value analysis and dive into the three key methods for gathering this crucial feedback: Surveys, Focus Groups, and 1-1 Interviews.

The 'Why' Behind Value Analysis

Why do we engage in value analysis? It's a question that underpins our methodology and provides a rationale for our efforts. At its core, value analysis seeks to achieve two vital objectives:

  1. Understand Diverse Perspectives: Associations serve a diverse audience, each with unique needs, challenges, and aspirations. Value analysis allows us to grasp these perspectives comprehensively, ensuring that our products and services cater to a broad spectrum of member and sponsor requirements.

  2. Efficient Decision-Making: In a world of finite resources, every decision must be efficient and well-informed. Value analysis equips us with the data and insights required to make strategic decisions about what to offer, how to offer it, and at what price.

Three Essential Feedback Methods

To embark on a value analysis journey, we employ three key methods, each with its strengths and ideal contexts.  We’ll dive more into each of these three, including our own templates, later in this chapter, but to begin, here is an overview:

1. Surveys:

When to Use:

  • Surveys are excellent for collecting data from a large audience quickly.

  • They are well-suited for quantitative feedback, allowing us to gather numerical data and percentages.

Pros:

  • Scalability: Surveys can be distributed widely, making it possible to collect a large volume of responses.

  • Anonymity: Respondents often feel more comfortable providing honest feedback when their responses are anonymous.

  • Quantitative Data: Surveys generate numerical data that can be statistically analyzed, offering concrete insights.

Cons:

  • Limited Depth: Surveys might lack the depth of understanding that can be achieved through more interactive methods.

  • Potential for Bias: Poorly designed surveys can introduce bias into the data, skewing results.

2. Focus Groups:

When to Use:

  • Focus groups shine when exploring qualitative insights and understanding the 'why' behind responses.

  • They are valuable when you need to delve deeper into specific topics or issues.

Pros:

  • In-Depth Understanding: Focus groups provide a platform for participants to elaborate on their thoughts, giving richer context.

  • Interaction: They facilitate dialogue and interaction among participants, leading to valuable discussions.

  • Qualitative Data: Focus groups yield qualitative data that captures nuances and motivations.

Cons:

  • Limited Scalability: Due to their interactive nature, focus groups involve a smaller number of participants.

  • Potential for Dominance: Some participants may dominate the conversation, potentially silencing others.

3. 1-1 Interviews:

When to Use:

  • 1-1 interviews are ideal for gathering in-depth insights from individuals or stakeholders.

  • They are particularly effective when dealing with sensitive topics or personal experiences.

Pros:

  • Personalized Insights: Individual interviews allow for a deeper understanding of the participant's perspective.

  • Flexibility: Interviewers can adapt questions in real-time based on responses, probing for deeper insights.

  • Confidentiality: Participants may feel more comfortable sharing sensitive information in a one-on-one setting.

Cons:

  • Resource-Intensive: Conducting individual interviews can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

  • Limited to Individuals: The insights are limited to the experiences and perspectives of individual participants.

Incorporating these three feedback methods into your value analysis toolkit enables associations to gather comprehensive insights efficiently. Each method serves a unique purpose, and the choice between them should align with your objectives and the depth of understanding required. In the end, value analysis is not just about collecting data; it's about empowering associations to refine their offerings, meet diverse needs, and excel in serving their members, attendees, and sponsors.

Dr. Michael Tatonetti, CAE, CPP

Dr. Michael Tatonetti is a Certified Association Executive and Certified Pricing Professional on a mission to advance associations in their pricing models for financial sustainability. As a Strategic Consultant and Trainer, he works with associations to harmonize pricing and value across membership, education, sponsorship, events, and marketing.Dr. Michael is a proud Association Forum Forty Under 40 honoree for his dedication to the association field.

https://www.pricingforassociations.com
Previous
Previous

Organizational Decision-Making for Value Delivery

Next
Next

Lead With Value